Many research studies
discuss the importance of student attitudes and knowledge in the use of Web
2.0 tools in the classroom- both online and face to face courses. Fewer research studies discuss the importance
of the classroom instructor’s attitudes and knowledge on the successful
implementation of lessons using Web 2.0 tools.
For those of us who are enthused about Web 2.0 tools, we may not
understand the anxiety, fear and even the general negative attitude that some
hold towards changing their curriculum, especially with technology and Web 2.0
tools.
In this study,
Instructors teaching a college success skills course to entering college
freshman will be asked to implement three Web 2.0 tools into their courses for
Fall 2013 after receiving 8 hours of Web 2.0 instruction. It is thought that receiving specific and
partially individualized instruction on the use of these tools will improve
instructor attitudes towards implementing them in their course.
The in-service/training
will cover the following:
-
What is Web 2.0?
-
Trends in education
-
An overview of Web 2.0 tools in the areas of communication,
collaboration, productivity and social media.
-
Demonstration of how to use some Web 2.0 tools with specific
components/lessons from the textbook.
o Voicethread
o twiducate
o NoteMesh
o WallWisher
o Google Docs
o SlideRocket
o Research tools
o MindMapping tools
-
Group Work/Discussion on specific assignments and teaching
strategies.
-
One on one time with Training instructors and Distance Learning
Director to work on specific questions/strategies
-
Training instructors and Distance Learning Director will be
available for support and brainstorming after the in-service is complete.
1. Why is the study important?
The study is important
because as instructors, we need to understand the impact that our attitudes
regarding technology may have on the attitudes of our students. Attitudes may be changed as instructors
become less intimidated and anxious and become more educated themselves in
using Web 2.0 tools. Providing specific
training in the use of these tools may improve instructors attitudes on using
them in the classroom.
2. Who are the subjects/participants of the
proposed study?
The participants for
this study are the Instructors teaching the College Success Skills Course
offered at Lamar Institute of Technology during the Fall 2012 semester. The
College Success Skills Course (DORI) is a required course for most entering
freshman and is 2 credit hours.
There are a variety of instructors for
this course: some are full-time tenured/tenure-track instructors that teach the
course as an overload, the majority are adjuncts that specifically teach this
course. Besides the Lead Teacher who
teaches 5 sections per semester, the rest teach no more than 2 sections a
semester.
This course is offered in Fall/Spring/Summer semesters. Three to four
courses are taught in the summer semester, 20-25 sections are taught in Spring,
and 38-42 sections are taught in the Fall semester. Of these sections, 2-3 sections are taught
completely online each of the long semesters.
3. What is the basic research question?
This study will address the following questions:
A.
Is there a significant difference in
the Instructor’s attitudes towards integration of Web 2.0 tools before
and after participation in a teacher in-service/training?
B.
Is there a significant difference in the
instructors self-reported knowledge and anxiety level regarding Web 2.0 tools
before and after participation in a teacher in-service/training?
C.
Is there a significant difference between the
instructors’ attitudes towards Web 2.0 tools after participation in a teacher
in-service/training and instructors’ attitudes at the completion of the
semester?
D.
Is there a significant difference in
attitudes and knowledge about Web 2.0 tools between adjunct and tenure track
faculty when measured pre/post in-service and the end of the semester?
E.
Do positive teacher attitudes foster
positive student attitudes regarding the use of Web 2.0 tools in the classroom?
4. Where would the study be conducted?
This study will be conducted at Lamar Institute of Technology in Beaumont
Texas. Some components will be presented
in an online format (pre/post surveys and questionnaires). Other components will be presented in face to
face learning sessions.
The in-service training sessions could be held in one 8-hour day or two
4-hour days.
5. What is the time frame of the study?
The time frame of the study will be approximately 6 months- from June 2013
to December 2013. The study will begin early
summer to allow time for instructors to integrate Web 2.0 tools into their
course curriculum for Fall 2013.
6. What type of data would be collected?
As instructors are a major influence in the ‘feel’
of a classroom, it is thought that an instructors’ attitude towards
implementation of new Web 2.0 tools in the classroom could play a significant
role in the success of that implementation. Information from surveys conducted
at three points will be collected.
Student information regarding the use of technology
will be collected at the end of the semester.
7. How the data would be
analyzed?
Two weeks
before In-service: A survey of 20
items containing both Likert scale questions and open ended questions will be
emailed to all DORI instructors with responses due one week prior to the
in-service. These questions will address
current attitudes and use of technology in the classroom.
This survey will be given again at the end of the 8
hours in-service program. Instructors will have 48 hours to return the survey
(some instructors may be very overwhelmed after attending the training session)
This survey will be emailed to instructors during
the final week of the Fall 2013 semester. Additional open-ended questions will
be asked regarding the Web 2.0 tools used and perceived/measurable success of
implementation and use of the tool.
In addition to end of the semester teacher
evaluation, students will receive a 10 item Likert scale questionnaire
regarding the use of and attitudes regarding the use and effectiveness of technology in the classroom and the
perceived attitude of the instructor in the delivery of Web 2.0 skills/lesson.
Surveys will be analyzed using both qualitative and
quantitative tools.
8.
What study was the inspiration for this study? (Please cite author, title,
where it was published, and the URL)
These articles, from the ERIC database, were the inspiration for this proposal:
Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T.S. & Williams, M.
(2010). Professional Development 2.0: Transforming Teacher Education Pedagogy
with 21st Century Tools. Journal
of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 4-11.
Christensen, R. (2002).
Effects of Technology Integration Education on the Attitudes of Teacher
and Students. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 34(4), 411.
Cullen, T.A. & Greene, B.A. (2011). Preservice Techer’s
Beliefs, Attitudes and Motivation about Technology Integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 45(1), 29-47.
No comments:
Post a Comment